RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02468
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 28 Nov 12, which resulted in a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) and consequent discharge board, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The physical training leader (PTL) administering the assessment unjustly terminated the 1.0 mile walk for running. The PTL was incorrect, he (the applicant) acted in accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2905 Fitness Program_AFGM4 (dated 26 Jun 12) attachment 8. Airmen performing the 1.0-mile walk, must walk but not run, keeping at least one foot in contact with the ground at all times. He never lost contact with the track during the 1.0 mile walk.
There were inadequate personnel in position to determine a violation of test protocol.
Two PTLs are required to be present at all times and only one was present. Additionally the PTL was a civilian which violated protocol at the time.
The PTL who terminated the cardio portion of the FA has an adversarial history with the applicant.
In support of these contentions the applicant submits the following: E-mail history pertaining to the physical fitness assessment in question; Pictures of the 1-mile base track from each angle with explanations and LOR paperwork pertaining to the failed assessment.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
At the time of the contested FA the applicant was serving as a Technical Sergeant (E-6) in the regular Air Force.
On 28 Nov 12 the applicant participated in the contested FA, completing only the Abdominal Circumference (AC) component. He received an unsatisfactory composite score of 17.00.
A similar request was denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) on 2 Jan 14 due to insufficient evidence, specifically witness statement to support injustice.
(IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 AFGM4 attachment 1 paragraph 5. FACs will supervise Airmen conducting push-ups, sit-ups, and the 1.5 mile run/1.0-mile walk at a ratio of no more than 12 members for every one FAC staff member or Physical Training Leader (PTL). When multiple Airmen are testing, they will pair off and count for each other while the FAC staff member/PTL provides oversight to ensure proper form.
AFI 36-2905 AFGM4 A8.1.2. 1.0 mile walk, trained personnel will monitor participants, ensuring all members complete entire course and are continuously observed for course completion.
______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to remove the contested FA, citing the lack of supporting evidence.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 24 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. While the applicant has provided a personal statement, photos of the fitness track, and letters between him and the PTL who administered the test, he has not met his burden of proving the contested FA should be removed from his records. In this respect, we note the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation to include; witness statements corroborating his contentions; evidence from the FAC stating that the FA was administered incorrectly; and support from his chain-of-command recommending that the FA be invalidated. Moreover, the applicants AFFMS report shows a history of unsatisfactory FA scores, which indicate his inability to consistently meet fitness standards. Should the applicant provide sufficient evidence to support his claim, we would be willing to reconsider his request. However, in view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02468 in Executive Session on 30 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
XXXXXXXXXX, Member
XXXXXXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 May 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 9 Dec 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jan 14.
XXXXXXXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03936
While the applicant renders a variety of arguments intended undermine the functioning of the heart rate monitors used during the contested FAs, the only real evidence he has provided in support of his assertions is a supporting statement from a colleague who says he made an independent measurement of the applicants heart rate after the end of the 5 May 13 FA. However, we do not find this statement or the applicants arguments sufficient to conclude that he is the victim of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04891
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her fitness assessment score sheet has an incorrect run time of 16 minutes and 23 seconds. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we see no evidence of error or impropriety in the administration of the contested FA and subsequent score. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03483
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03483 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 13 Jul 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Body composition (height, weight, and AC) must be the first component assessed in the FA. While the weight is not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04155
Therefore, they recommend the AC component of the FA dated 31 Jul 2012, be updated to reflect "exempt" in AFFMS. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The facts support his assertion that the entire FA should be removed from his record and that he should be granted the opportunity to re-test immediately. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04155
Therefore, they recommend the AC component of the FA dated 31 Jul 2012, be updated to reflect "exempt" in AFFMS. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The facts support his assertion that the entire FA should be removed from his record and that he should be granted the opportunity to re-test immediately. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006
His providers memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test. On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05107
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05107 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 21 Sep 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant did not provide any evidence his 1.0 mile walk was improperly administered during the FA. The 21 Sep 2012 FA was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04136
On 14 Jan 13 the applicant completed the contested FA with an unsatisfactory score. On 14 Feb 14, the applicants request was considered and partially granted by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB). The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00330
An unsatisfactory is a composite score less than 75 and/or one or more component minimums are not met. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the applicant failed to demonstrate a clear error or injustice. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03075
A list of the applicants FAs since she entered the service is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 3 Jul 13 75.67 Exempt Satisfactory *15 Apr 13 81.00 25/0.00 Unsatisfactory 23 Nov 12 87.10 38/6.00 Satisfactory 16 Apr 12 84.10 42/7.50 Satisfactory *Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis that, The applicants injury was validated by the applicants medical provider, but there was no...